Serious issues within the Bill of Costs: Costs reduced from £260k to £nil at Detailed Assessment The matter of Kapoor (Deceased) v Johal was recently heard by Costs Judge James in the Senior Courts Costs Office. A number of serious issues...
The matter of Asmat Bi v Tesco Underwriting Limited was recently heard in the Country Court at Manchester before HHJ Sephton KC. The matter concerned a claim for damages as a result of a road traffic accident. No personal injuries were suffered and the claim consisted of damages in respect of hire and repairs only.
Nicholas Worcester v Dr Philip Hopley [2024] EWHC 2181 (KB)
The Defendant sought a specific costs order against the Claimant due to significant reductions made to their costs budget at a Costs Management Conference, the below deals with the outcome of said application, dealt with at a hearing on 16 July 2024 before Master Thornett.
The Claimant retained the Defendant in September 2017 to assist with a property dispute. The dispute initially concerned unpaid service charges by the Claimant’s landlord but expanded to include a claim for disrepair, allegations of harassment and a disagreement with a neighbour about overhanging trees.
Pan-NOx Emissions Litigation: Budgets Were Considered to be Excessive, Unreliable and Unjustified
The Costs Management Conference of the Pan-NOx emissions litigation recently took place over 3 days in the London High Court. Mr Justice Constable and Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker considered some interesting points relating to Group Litigation, the construction of these budgets and costs budgeting generally.
Contribution Costs: To what extent should a Part 20 Defendant be liable for the costs of a Part 20 Claimant
In the matter of Healey v McGrath & Ramsay Health Care Uk Operations Limited [2024] EWHC 1360 (KB), the Court considered an application by the Second Defendant for a contribution towards costs and damages from the First Defendant.
This case deals with the costs decisions reached by Justice Fancourt following the trial of 3 of the 4 test claims in the mirror newspaper hacking litigation, Ms Sanderson, Ms Wightman & Mr Turner. The fourth being the action by the Duke of Sussex which was being considered separately.
Mr Kenig and his sister were beneficiaries of a Will. Thomas Snell & Passmore LLP (“TSP”) were instructed by the sole executor of the Will (Mr Saul Biber) to administer the estate. TSP’s initial estimate was £10,000 - £15,000 plus VAT and expenses, but they ended up charging £54,410.99 plus VAT and expenses.
In Sellers v Simpkins [2023] EWHC 3296 (SCCO) Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker considered the costs recoverable by a solicitor when their client terminates their CFA.
In Lifestyle Equities CV & Anor v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club & Ors [2023] EWHC 2923 (CH) Mr Justice Mellor considered three issues relevant to costs whether a deduction should be made to the successful parties’ costs; the making of an interim payment, and whether a consequentials hearing should be included in the costs budget, or assessed separately.
